Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-14282052-20170628214531/@comment-27391152-20170921105746

I agree that Josh deserved the win over Paul since if you convince the jury to vote for you, then you deserve it over your competitor. However, Josh, as a whole, did not by any means deserve that win.

You said it yourself that social game is what matters most (second behind jury management imo), and Josh had almost little to no social game at all! It all started by isolating himself from everyone in the first few days, which put him in a terrible position at the start, and if it weren't for Christmas and Paul, he would have been gone very early on. He picked fights with half the goddamn house, not because he thought it would place a target on their backs, but because PAUL TOLD HIM TO. Anyone who watched the feeds would know that every time Josh called someone out was either A) because they got on his nerves or B) because Paul told him to. His whole argument about that being his strategic move is complete garbage.

Furthermore, even disregarding his social game, his strategic game was solely based on what Paul and Christmas told him to do, and while at times he showed that he could think for himself, he never actually USED this knowledge to do anything! I'd love to hear just ONE social move or ONE strategic move that Josh, and only Josh, made that actually benefitted him because, off the top of my head, I can't seem to name a damn one! The only thing I can think of is his goodbye messages, which honestly, I don't think he even INTENDED to use to expose Paul's game, but simply to try to explain why he had to betray someone.