Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-14282052-20170628214531/@comment-27391152-20170921120253

I already said that he deserved the win over Paul, no need to argue that. I'm just saying that while Paul didn't deserve the win, I don't feel Josh really deserved it either.

I never said moving with the bigger alliance means that Josh had a bad social game, I'm saying that him isolating himself was proof of his bad social game, and if it weren't for Christmas pitying him and Cody being a moron by breaking up that majority alliance, Josh would've been out within about three weeks. He did not actively go out and try to work himself in with the majority alliance, Paul saw him as someone he could manipulate, and Christmas felt sorry for him, nothing that Josh did intentionally from what I saw early on. And whether or not picking fights with people is a part of his personality, it's still never a good idea.

As for the knowledge against Paul, if Josh seriously doesn't have the capability to make a move without Christmas' permission, that just shows that he did not position himself very well in that house. I mean his closest freaking ally likely wouldn't have even taken him to the end, which is pretty telling imo.

Josh started the game by isolating himself at the bottom of the house, was scooped up by Paul and Christmas who essentially dictated his every single move and got dragged to the end by little to no merit of his own. His whole game revolved around being loyal to those two people, not because he thought the jury would appreciate it, but because they were his friends. He had a good performance in the jury questioning, although I do think most of it was revisionist's history, but, at the end of the day, he didn't really do anything in my eyes that made him a worthy winner. Sorry.